@weejonnie said:
One other reason for not skipping the score: If you leave it blank then a pair can fall below the 70% rule - which would mean that no one in the session would get masterpoints.
You've said this before in another forum and it's simply not true!
Yes -but I thought it was a slightly different situation - My original post was that a half table could affect the 70% rule, which was disabused . This time it is failing to enter a score with another pair at the table.
@weejonnie said:
One other reason for not skipping the score: If you leave it blank then a pair can fall below the 70% rule - which would mean that no one in the session would get masterpoints.
You've said this before in another forum and it's simply not true!
Yes -but I thought it was a slightly different situation - My original post was that a half table could affect the 70% rule, which was disabused . This time it is failing to enter a score with another pair at the table.
Why would that fall foul of the regulation, which is based on number of boards scheduled to be played, not boards scored?
Comments
Yes -but I thought it was a slightly different situation - My original post was that a half table could affect the 70% rule, which was disabused . This time it is failing to enter a score with another pair at the table.
Why would that fall foul of the regulation, which is based on number of boards scheduled to be played, not boards scored?